What’s not working (yet) with Google+

email article email article print article print article tip @techmeme

Despite shattering all records by gaining 10 million users in two weeks, and another 8 million the following week, Google+ is hardly the polished platform many were expecting. The new social network is still in its beta testing phase, so the issues will be fixed in future, but there are several problems already and users are clamouring for Google to fix them. Aside from the predictable bugs and server crashes, here are the top three things which just aren’t working well yet.

1. Complexity
Google+ is trying to be and do a lot of things at once. Not only is it a platform for socially sharing media with specifically defined groups of contacts (called circles), it’s also a blog aggregator, photo-sharing tool, instant messenger, video chat portal and public profile.

The problem with all of these aspects is twofold. First, it makes Google+ appear very decentralised. While the chat stream is the default home location, even this page includes links to contacts, chat and sparks (aggregated articles on specific topics). It’s very hard to define what Google+ actually does or what role it fills.

Second, it makes using the social network very complex. For example, before you can share or receive messages, you need to put contacts into circles. But a contact can be in several circles at once, and you can mistakenly add the same person if they are using a different email address. Something that should be very simple is made complex by the sheer number of steps involved. And since there’s no one-click sharing web tool yet, users have to keep logging in and manually entering content.

2. Not enough control for the stream
The stream – the main content hub of Google+ – has almost no tools for customisability or control. Currently, you can choose either to read all your contacts’ posts at once (in the generic stream view) or you can view content from just one circle (by clicking on its name). But there’s no way to view content from, say, two circles at once, or to hide all but one circles from the stream feed. The result is that users have to add people to multiple circles, rather than just combining circles as need be.

In addition, there’s little one can do to filter or manage the individual posts. You see all comments on a contact’s post, even if they are by people you haven’t added (particularly irksome if the post has been reshared from someone outside your circles). Blocking a contact only removes future posts by them, but leaves current ones intact.

“Plus-one”ing a post (the equivalent to Liking) doesn’t seem to have much effect and there is nowhere to see all posts that you have clicked on. Overall, the stream needs a lot of refinement to become truly useful and worthwhile. Other areas of the interface suffer too — for example, you cannot choose to see photos from just one circle; it’s all or nothing.

3. Endless notifications
One of the biggest complaints about Google+ is the endless stream of email notifications every time somebody adds you to a circle, comments on a post, tags you in a photo and so on. While there are now custom contact settings that allow you to switch these off, this should have been better thought through. On top of the emails, users receive in-browser notifications of Google+ activity if they are logged in to a Google Account website (like Gmail or Google Docs) and a constant stream of suggestions and links in the right hand column on Google+ itself. The various channels also take a while to update, so it’s possible to add someone to a circle from Google+, and still have them register as un-added in the notification bar.

Google+ looks pretty and feels as though it should be a great platform — and it takes privacy seriously, which is a major boon. Unfortunately, when compared to the slick and simple offerings of competitors like Facebook and Twitter, it still has a long way to go.

Image: wallpapers-place.com

email article email article print article print article

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Lemon-Mgcini-Godlwayo/100001536009599 Lemon Mgcini Godlwayo

    With regards to point 2 I think it makes sense for comments to inherit the visibility of the item they’re posted on. Posts create a conversation. It’d be silly if smone you’re following started responding to a comment u can’t see but u can see the comment they’re responding on. The +1 I think is currently working same way as facebook’s “like”.

  • http://www.facebook.com/GlennDavisDoctorG Glenn Davis

    Anna, the service is somewhat “complex” in certain ways for a reason….at least at this juncture.

    - Glenn Davis Doctor G

Related Articles on the Web

Related articles

Topics for this article

[ advertising enquiries ]

Share
  • BURN MEDIA TV

    WATCH THE LATEST EPISODE NOW
    Latest Episode
    Review of Gmail Inbox app

MORE HEADLINES

news

VIEW MORE

interviews

VIEW MORE

future trends

VIEW MORE

entrepreneurship

VIEW MORE

social media

VIEW MORE

facebook

VIEW MORE

twitter

VIEW MORE

google

VIEW MORE

advertising & marketing

VIEW MORE

online media

VIEW MORE

design

VIEW MORE

mobile

VIEW MORE

More in Google, Social networking

Google acquires social network, The Fridge

Read More »