| gearburn | twitter | subscribe: email or RSS | about | contact | advertise | headline widget

 memeburn.com   memejobs.com

Why manufacturers should just leave Android alone

email article email article print article print article tip @techmeme


We’ve all read the comparisons, we know about the rivalry, but one thing that has recently started bugging me about the epic Android vs Apple battle is the omission of a key fact. One of Android’s strengths, as I mentioned in a previous post, is that it’s available on a wide range of handsets, giving you plenty of choice. With this choice, however, comes a few sacrifices and I’ve only come to realise this key fact now.

Samsung, HTC, Motorola, and Sony Ericsson are the four biggest manufacturers supplying Android phones, and although they run on the Android OS, each of these manufacturers adds its own little, or sometimes major, touches to the user interface and functionality of the handset. Samsung adds TouchWiz, Motorola adds its MOTOBLUR and Sony Ericsson’s UI is known as Timescape.

The only one I have personal experience with came on my HTC in the form of its Sense UI. Make no mistake, this is a very slick, very good looking wrapping for what many deem a “raw” form of Android, Froyo.

After Froyo — short for frozen yoghurt — Google released Android 2.3, codenamed, Gingerbread. And this is where my gripe with Android starts. HTC Sense looks great and everything, but why can’t users choose whether they want it or not? In other words, why can’t Android users just get what is referred to as “Vanilla” Android as a choice?

I get that HTC wants to offer its best possible product, but for users who value stability, speed and battery life this just simply doesn’t work. That is why there are literally hundreds of Android forums online, discussing rooting, troubleshooting, devs providing support for their ROMs, because many of those users want the vanilla android experience, and their phones are all the better for it. I don’t want it to kill the dev community, because I don’t believe it could, but I think there is real value in it for users.

It’s why I rooted my Desire and its performance was much, much better. ROMs built straight from the Android source code, such as Oxygen, offer incredible improvements to supported devices. However,

I recently got my hands on a Samsung Nexus S and as a Google branded phone, there are no traces of Samsung software, often referred to as bloatware, here. It’s all pure Android and it’s just better.

It’s slick, provides killer battery life and it, in my mind, is a true reflection of where Android is compared to the old nemesis, Apple. In shine and polish, Android isn’t quite at Apple’s level, and I doubt it every will be, I do, however, prefer dark backgrounds on a screen to lighter shades, so it works for me.

Functionality is where Android really comes to the party though, from the much discussed notification drop down menu iOS 5 borrowed from Android, to the NFC technology available in the Nexus S, Google is ahead in the tech side of things, and that’s only Gingerbread, wait until Ice Cream Sandwich launches on the new Galaxy Nexus. Then the game changes again.

So back to my gripe, manufacturers taking choice out of the equation for users by loading bloatware and the like on their handsets, this will not do. Android is very fragmented, yes, and for a true indication of which is the most current version available via Google, check out the Nexus range. The Nexus range is the only true Android competition to Apple, because it’s the only real Google handset, designed and conceptualised by the search giant.

If manufacturers would just realise that they are the ones exacerbating Android’s fragmentation, maybe we can all stay up to date, all the time.

It’s the way it should be, it’s an open source project (well much less that I originally thought, I have to add, but that’s another story for another time), and distribution, which results in progress, should not be hindered by handset manufacturers.

What I mean is, imagine Apple releasing an update that isn’t available to all its users timeously…I think the internet might just break.

Image: etnyk


email article email article print article print article
[ advertising enquiries ]
  • http://www.twitter.com/wrg25 W!LL

    I totally agreed!

  • http://www.axiam-pc.co.uk Darren Forster

    Android has to let other companies play around with it’s software though if it is likely to suceed and beat Apple.

    Look at all the other things in the past that have been very restrictive and look where they went –

    Sony Betamax vs VHS, the developers of VHS allowed everyone to produce VHS tapes and change the format in various ways including adding copy protection to films, etc, they also allowed numerous manufacturers to produce there own versions of VHS tape players,  VHS took off where as Betamax died a death.

    Sony Minidisc vs CD – Again Sony very restrictive on who used their product and made sure that it was only in Sony products, didn’t allow many other manufacturers to play around or produce their own units, CD was a format developed by Sony and Philips and was leased to numerous manufacturers all allowing them to do various things with the CD format, including adding copy protection, using the discs for both data and music.  The CD ruled.

    PC vs Archimedes/Amiga/ST/Mac – The PC yet again allowed numerous manufacturers to produce and change their technology and alter the format – Archimedes was mady by Acorn (ARM), Amiga was made only by Commodore, ST was only made by Atari and Mac only by Apple.  All those other 4 formats were very restrictive on who could build the units and what was in them.  Whilst they did end up with a top quality product, to this date the only one of the three that still survives is the Mac and that was only by pure luck more than anything (the Amiga is always trying to make a comeback).  Where as now because so many people can build PC’s and use various parts to make the PC do what they want it to, there are more PC’s than any other type of computer out there.

    There have been a few exceptions to this – for example the MSX and the 3DO which both were done as computers and games consoles that numerous companies could produce and modify, but neither of these took off.

    Of course the reason behind this is that by allowing numerous companies to use your invention and not restricting it to just your own products you widen the amount of people that are using your invention and giving it far more option of expanding.

    I would never buy an iPhone myself so I would never use iOS for the simple reason that I don’t like how restrictive the Apple phones are and also that when they first came out they were very much overpriced and lacked a lot of features that other rival manufacturers could easily put in the phone, and even now some of things on the new iPhones are very poor compared to rival brands (you only need to watch the joke video with the bears on Youtube to see this!).  I currently have a HTC HD2 which can boot into either WM6.5 or Android.  Now if Apple released iOS to other manufacturers such as HTC, Samsung, Sony, or Motorola then I might end up with a phone running iOS and this would increase Apples share in the number of people using iOS rather than just restricting it to their own phones.  Apple should be more worried than Google now, especially with Steve Jobs gone, without branching out and allowing other manufacturers to use their technology they could be going down the same dead end street that things like Betamax, Minidisc, and ST went.

  • Rick Bosch

    @TheKLF99:disqus Man, that comment deserves to be a post by itself, some great points in there. I just think that because of the bloat added to Android, manufacturers aren’t doing the actual OS any favours. It slows down handsets, and especially HTC is bad with updates. The Desire is a great example, no official OTA of Gingerbread from HTC, however, a rooted Desire, running vanilla Android completely transforms the phone, and I’m sure that it’s not the only one. 
    That being said, it’s all irrelevant now, because it’s all set to change, Ice Cream Sandwich is coming, and I cannot wait.

  • Anom nom nom

    This post made my Hungry….Ice-cream Sandwich! mmmmmm

  • Anonymous

    I’ve been thinking about this exact topic recently and I think the solution is that Google should require handset manufacturers to allow the user to switch to the basic Android which would then be update according to Google. I’m not just taking about removing the skin, but replacing the while os with a version of Android that is controlled by Google.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_K3MVOVHEK4AZY777NI5KWHGL5U David Jenkins

    This has been said 1,000,000 times. I think the manufacturers are pissing off customers AND wasting their own money by having developers develop/support/upgrade all these overlays.

    I think one problem is that most customers don’t actually know or care that they have overlays. Then they’ll say “my phone sucks” or “my phone is too slow” and eventually move to iOS. I’ve seen this happen a few times. I own a Nexus so I always tell them to try a Nexus phone, but they are confused what “vanilla android” means. The OEMs are killing themselves AND the platform with all this crapware.

  • Pingback: Why manufacturers should just leave Android alone – Memeburn | South Africa - iWooho.com

  • Matt

    I agree, I have a low end HTC Wildfire which was slow and never received an OTA update beyond FroYo, but rooting and removing sense has given my phone an extra year of speedy outlook HTC clearly doesn’t think this phonecan handle…thanks AOSP and XDA devs!

  • Brother451

    Best article ever. Spot on. As a current HTC Incredible owner I will never buy another HTC device until it has a “stock” android option. The nexus will be my next phone. All these manufacturers are spending big money just to shoot themselves in the foot.

  • Rick Bosch

    That’s exactly why I have a Nexus S. Glad you liked the article. 

  • cynicalgeek

    I’m sure this is why Google is interested in buying Motorola. The device cos are making the phones crap on purpose so we’ll buy new ones each upgrade cycle. It’s planned obsolescence–a very old game.

  • http://profiles.google.com/webstar9 Mike S.

    andriod is evil.  google is evil.  STAY AWAY!  why do you think carrier IQ is getting their asses sued off?

Most popular articles


Topics for this article

[ advertising enquiries ]

MORE HEADLINES

news

VIEW MORE

interviews

VIEW MORE

future trends

VIEW MORE

entrepreneurship

VIEW MORE

social media

VIEW MORE

facebook

VIEW MORE

twitter

VIEW MORE

google

VIEW MORE

advertising & marketing

VIEW MORE

online media

VIEW MORE

design

VIEW MORE

mobile

VIEW MORE