Are Google Music and iTunes match redundant on today’s web?

email article email article print article print article tip @techmeme


The launches of Google Music and iTunes Match were good news for music lovers all over the web. In iTunes Match, Apple finally has a cloud-based solution for accessing all your music on any iOS device, and with Google Music, Google can finally say it offers Android users a service that is competitive with iTunes.

Both of these announcements would have been really exciting to me two or three years ago. Today, however, they leave me absolutely cold. Why? Because I stopped buying music a long time ago in favour of using a subscription service like MOG, Rdio or Rhapsody. I know there are still many people out there who love the idea of owning music, but to me, it feels like Google Music and iTunes Match are smart solutions for a problem these subscription services solved for me in a long time ago.

Both Google and Apple are still betting on the fact that music is something people want to own — and if you subscribe to Apple’s vision, that also means you will only buy Apple products for the foreseeable future.

Don’t get me wrong. I listen to music almost all the time I’m at my computer or in the car. I love music. But unlike iTunes and Co., subscription services allow me to call up any song I want to listen to whenever I feel like it. They also allow me to listen to artists I would’ve never discovered if I just used iTunes. With iTunes or Google Music, after all, I would have to make a pretty hefty investment to listen to all the albums I listen to on MOG every month. With a subscription service, the investment remains the same no matter how much I listen.

Add in the fact that Spotify took the bold step of partnering with Facebooka move which garnered it an extra 8-million or so subscribers — and you suddenly have a situation on your hands where one of the biggest players in the music streaming game has an ace up its sleeve that Google and Apple can only dream of: potential access to an 800-million plus strong customer base.

Both Google and Apple base their services around the idea that you want to own your music. To me, music is more like subscribing to Hulu or Netflix. Sure, my music “collection” goes away when I stop subscribing or switch services – but who cares? How many of those MP3s you collected on Napster years ago do you actually listen to regularly after all?

email article email article print article print article

  • Calvin

    Subscription services might work for you in your first world country, but for the rest of the world it’s smarter to have your own mp3s as internet access is limited, slow or non-existent. Owning your own music also gives a person a sense of belonging to something bigger, culturally, religiously or for whatever other reason they want to believe in. so sorry, until the whole world has a constant cheap internet, google and apple have it spot on…we want to own or music.

Related Articles on the Web

Related articles

Topics for this article

[ advertising enquiries ]

Share
  • BURN MEDIA TV

    WATCH THE LATEST EPISODE NOW
    Latest Episode
    Sony Xperia Z2 Review

MORE HEADLINES

news

VIEW MORE

interviews

VIEW MORE

future trends

VIEW MORE

entrepreneurship

VIEW MORE

social media

VIEW MORE

facebook

VIEW MORE

twitter

VIEW MORE

google

VIEW MORE

advertising & marketing

VIEW MORE

online media

VIEW MORE

design

VIEW MORE

mobile

VIEW MORE

More in Apple, Google

Google Zeitgeist 2011: The world really loved Rebecca Black

Read More »