| gearburn | twitter | subscribe: email or RSS | about | contact | advertise | headline widget

 memeburn.com   memejobs.com

Nokia is not BlackBerry

email article email article print article print article tip @techmeme

Nokia’s in trouble! BlackBerry is in trouble! There is a tendency, especially among Wall Street talking heads and US tech bloggers who don’t understand anything outside of the Valley, to group underperforming companies together. After all, it makes for great headlines and “everyone” knows the mobile battle is between iPhone and Android.

Except it’s not.

Nokia and Research In Motion (the maker of BlackBerry) cannot compare on size. In its most recent quarter, Nokia shipped 113.5-million devices, totaling revenue of €6-billion (close to $8-billion). Even as it shifts its smartphone platform to Windows Phone and practically ensures a dead-end for its current devices, Nokia shipped 19.6-million smartphones. RIM, by comparison, shipped 14.1 million BlackBerry phones. But it’s impossible to establish turnover from this number. Its overall revenue for the quarter was $5.2-billion but this includes enterprise hardware as well as service revenue.

The consumerisation of BlackBerry has caused most to forget that at its core, RIM is a services business firmly integrated in operator networks that also happens to sell smartphones. Think BlackBerry Enterprise Server (BES). This is why, despite its current travails, it still has a lock on enterprises. BES is wedded to Outlook in corporates. The money is not in phones (unless you’re Apple). Nokia, for instance, reports its average selling price of smartphones is €140 ($185). Admittedly, the margins are far better in smartphones than in the lower-end feature phones (average selling price of €32). RIM does not disclose its average selling price, but it’s speculated to be around the $250 mark (and cratering fast).

The stock price performance of both companies has been woeful. On a one-year view, Nokia shares are down 39.5% and Research In Motion stock is down 79%. RIM has traded below book value for a while. But, there is still value in these companies, not least of all because they both own valuable patent portfolios (Nokia more so than RIM). This is why nearly every company out there has had a look at RIM. Nokia, however, still remains too large for anyone to digest easily. The value destruction on the stock market has forced leadership change at both. Nokia appointed an outsider, Stephen Elop as President and CEO in September 2010. RIM founders and co-CEOs Mike Lazaridis and Jim Balsillie finally bowed to investor pressure and stepped down in January. They were replaced by the company’s remaining chief operating officer Thorsten Heins.

It’s in the articulation of strategy by these two leaders that the two companies couldn’t be more different. Elop has a plan and Nokia has consistently delivered against it over the past 18 months. His now famous “Burning Platform” memo shocked the company into action. Make no mistake, its shift to the Windows Phone platform for all its smartphones (and the broader deal with Microsoft) is company-changing. This is a fast-maturing ecosystem that offers the first true competition to iOS and Android. The Nokia of 2014 will be unrecognizable from the Nokia of 2009. And that’s a good thing.

It’s probably too early to judge Heins, but what we’ve heard so far is that it’s pretty much business-as-usual at RIM. At least he’s approaching the job with a more open mind than the founders who seemed to have their heads in the sand. Anything is possible, Heins says. Except the company is dead set on its new BB10 operating system (which has already been delayed). From what has leaked so far, BB10 is good. Except, its 12 months too late.

The only way either of these companies is going to survive is by jumping ahead of the market and offering something so compelling that consumers start seeing their smartphone devices as real alternatives to the iPhone/Android hegemony.

There are indications that Nokia has started achieving this. It won best of show at CES in January in a market its desperate to do well in. One just gets the feeling that BlackBerry is going to show up to the party late again.

There is no space for four different ecosystems. Developers will make sure one dies. Either Windows Phone or BlackBerry OS is going win. I know which my money’s on.


email article email article print article print article
[ advertising enquiries ]
  • Nar8iv

    Blackberry is a long way off from the sell-by date this article implies.
    While the argument above is valid it doesn’t consider that blackberry has one feature which will be a selling point for a very long time.

    BIS still provides one of the most effective solutions to expensive internet.
    I’m not sure if the other platforms described have a similar product?
    Please set me straight if they do.

    At the end of the day, for many people setting out to buy a phone when every bit of disposable income is under pressure price is still a swing vote clincher.

  • Smallz

    @aac04182f198aecec6bcde6fcce2d05d:disqus – With the ever cheapening bandwidth situation I think Blackberry is very much in danger of being put out in the cold. They do not have phones that are low end enough where internet is not a requirement. (like Nokia does). They do not have phones good enough to compete in the smart phone market (or app market) as a general package (like Android, Apple and now Windows/Nokia do. All they have is BBM and BIS. Both of these services can be bettered by competitors and internet service providers alike. Unless they come up with something new and pretty groundbreaking, I don’t see many consumers purchasing a Blackberry as their next smart phone in the next 2 – 3 years.

  • Skender

    The market share of Windows Phone is still tiny. From a developers point of view, it still makes a lot more sense to develop apps for Symbian than for Windows Phone. True: Symbian doesn’t have a future. But does windows Phone? Rumours are the next version of Windows Phone will no longer support Silverlight. It would be replaced by html5 and c++. If that’s true, the apps you develop for Windows Phone now, will not run on the next version.

    Currently, there are 3 big ecosystems for smartphone apps: iOS, Android and Symbian. We know only 2 of those will survive.
    Nokia and Microsoft keep talking about the “third ecosystem”. But is that anything more than wishful thinking? In the current market, this is a niche market next to the big 2, where good operating systems can compete for these customers who want a good phone with a full featured OS, but don’t care that much for apps. That is where I see Windows Phone.

    From what I here, Windows Phone is a good OS. But so is the Meego version of the Nokia N9 and so was WebOS.

  • Jo

    I agree with Nar8iv, Blackberry still does very well in developing markets.  In Africa it will take a LONG time for the “ever cheapening bandwidth” situation to apply to most households, be they rural or located in cities. Blackberry therefore provides easy access to the internet and downloads.

    Also what everyone seems to forget, is BBM.  Ok so there whatsapp, as far as I am aware you may only use this app for free for one year. Then you’ll have to pay to use it.  AND I have whatsapp installed on my Blackberry for those very few friends who don’t have a BB as well.

    My entire family and 90% of my friends have BB’s.  Now and again one or the other has opted for Iphone’s as upgrades and have changed back within a month, as they missed being able to chat for R59 a month to all BBM users as many times or as often as they want.

    Now that’s what I call capturing your market share.  Blackberry will certainly go far in Africa.  I see most people waiting in queus for taxis or the bus on the BB’s.  I even saw a couple of youngsters riding on a roof chatting on their BB’s!  (Next time I’ll take a picture, maybe they could use it in their next advertising campaign! lol)

  • Jim

    For R50 you can already buy a 100 MB bundle (and the price is constantly coming down) and have close to uncapped, if you stick to browsing and messaging like BIS forces you, on any phone.  The “free internet” argument simply does not apply any longer, and it’s just a matter of time before consumers realize this, or the networks leverage it as an advantage.

  • Md3wilso

    “All they have is BBM and BIS. Both of these services can be bettered by competitors and internet service providers alike.” – These services have been around for years and nobody is close to bettering them…

    Talking about App Dev – RIM hasn’t even released the super cool TAT stuff and there is already a buzz at the devcons with 1000s of new developers registering for RIM tools. No other platform has the current development hype RIM does. Alec Saunders is RIM’s new hero of the supergeekdom.

    Personally, I think the tide has turned for RIM  and this article is out of date.

  • Sharshar13

    “All they have is BBM and BIS” was addressed to Smallz and not an article quote but RIM has definately turned the tide! 

  • Pingback: Latest Blackberry News | Mobile Entertainment Technology

  • Anonymous

    The newer BB7 devices are really impressive, PlayBook 2.0 is amazing, well worth the wait, and BB10 is likely to blow your socks off. Developers are signing up in their thousands, RIM has record number of subscribers, record money in the bank, record income, this word “trouble”, I don’t think it means what you think it means.

  • Pingback: Nokia is not BlackBerry | memeburn | Blackberry or Die™

Related Articles on the Web

Related articles


Topics for this article

[ advertising enquiries ]

MORE HEADLINES

news

VIEW MORE

interviews

VIEW MORE

future trends

VIEW MORE

entrepreneurship

VIEW MORE

social media

VIEW MORE

facebook

VIEW MORE

twitter

VIEW MORE

google

VIEW MORE

advertising & marketing

VIEW MORE

online media

VIEW MORE

design

VIEW MORE

mobile

VIEW MORE