Privacy? Why you should actually be concerned about being tracked online

email article email article print article print article tip @techmeme


Hilton Tarrant recently wrote a piece on Memeburn entitled, “Privacy? Why you should let Google, Facebook and others track you online“. I had a few issues with the piece.

My feeling is that he’s uninformed on the matter, made bad assumptions owing to a technical error and decided to ignore some legal complexity, then presented us with a false-dichotomy between ugly display ads and personalised advertising. Let’s pick these apart one at a time.

Uninformed

In general, Hilton makes a common error when it comes to discussion of privacy, and online privacy in particular; he assumes he knows what he’s talking about. South Africa’s Iain Currie points out in his excellent paper “Some implications of a dignity-based conception of privacy“:

[Much] writing about privacy tends to be intuitionist. This is a form of moral argumentation that relies on people’s innate intuitions of right and wrong. [The] difficulty with [intuitionism] is the unreliability of its results. What some people experience as shameful violations of privacy, others do not.

It turns out that privacy is actually quite a tricky concept, and both the fields of moral philosophy and law have spent a considerable amount of nailing it down. If you are interested in reading more on this, a good place to start, is the Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy’s entry on the matter.

Further to that, “online privacy” can get quite tricky at a technical level. If you don’t believe me, ask yourself if you know what a Flash Local Storage Object is, and how it is used to track you (let alone how to control their use).

In demonstration of this, Hilton’s article incorrectly assumes that his DoubleClick ad-preferences profile is a complete indication of what Google knows about him. It isn’t — it’s merely what one division DoubleClick has mined and chosen to show to consumers (i.e. DoubleClick could know more but hasn’t told us because it would freak us out, or just hasn’t chosen to mine that info yet).

What’s wrong

Hilton goes on to ask what’s wrong with Google’s new policy, and posits that there’s nothing wrong, and the new single view Google will have of us will be great. The truth is, we don’t know what’s wrong. These policies are couched in so much legalese, and the actual legal requirements across borders are pretty complicated of late, with little case-law to help resolve it.

What we have seen, is people familiar with this stuff complaining. 36 US Attorneys General have raised concerns as well as regulators in the EU. We’ll wait for them to sort it out, but in the meantime, assuming there’s nothing wrong may be naive.

Even if Google somehow managed to navigate this quagmire, we’re still left with Google’s token attempts at providing us with tools to manage our privacy as it relates to their data collection. They have previously resisted attempts at providing reasonable consumer controls of their data collection, but due to pressure from US legislators, appear to only very recently be coming round.

False dichotomy

Hilton then goes on to extol the virtues of personalised ads, claiming that he’d much rather get something relevant to him, than the garish irrelevant display advertising of the past.

While I appreciate the “lose belly fat fast” advertising that Facebook thinks hits the mark with me, and I’m sure Hilton is looking forward to his “transportation and logistics” ads. You know what’s better? No advertising, coupled with easy ways of finding out information on products we actually want to purchase. I’m pretty paranoid — I block most advertising and tracking, sometimes going to pretty extreme lengths. Yet somehow I am still fully empowered to find products I want, research them in detail and purchase them from companies selling them.

Wrapping up

In short, I think Hilton is wrong, and he’s glossing over issues so important, they will fundamentally redefine parts of the online business model in the coming months and years. Consumer awareness is low, and their ability to exert actual control even lower. We need to raise awareness and support the development of tools and models that reverse the path we’re on. It’s important.

P.S. I know Hilton personally, and think he’s a great guy, I just don’t agree with his argument about privacy.

Image: chrissinerantzi

email article email article print article print article

  • John Gallen

    Thanks for that Dominic, much appreciated.

    I would love to read an article on your top choices for ad blocking and anti-tracking practices.

    Regards
    John

  • John Gallen

    Thanks for that Dominic, much appreciated.

    I would love to read an article on your top choices for ad blocking and anti-tracking practices.

    Regards
    John

  • http://twitter.com/SimonEspley Simon Espley

    “You know what’s better? No advertising, coupled with easy ways of finding out information on products we actually want to purchase.”  This seems like a naive and overly simplistic statement.  If there was no advertising there would be no media.  Something has to pay the overheads.

  • http://twitter.com/SimonEspley Simon Espley

    “You know what’s better? No advertising, coupled with easy ways of finding out information on products we actually want to purchase.”  This seems like a naive and overly simplistic statement.  If there was no advertising there would be no media.  Something has to pay the overheads.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Matthew-Stone/542770717 Matthew Stone

    I think privacy is a tricky one, but there’s part of this topic we need to bare in mind:
    Money. 
    If you’re not paying for a service, then you’re the product. The modern webspace is, almost by nature, free. This is a stark contrast to any other, similar, medium. Imagine Facebook or Google charged for use, it simply wouldn’t work. The idea is almost laughable. Even though both provide you with tools that you would otherwise expect to pay for (especially Google).

    Now, I’m not saying that that gives them a free pass… but as people vote with their actions, en mass they have decided that they would rather pay with our identities than their credit cards.

    When it comes to Facebook, a service that is all about sharing your personal life online, one should expect that information to serve as the payment for using the service.

    Google is a bit more subversive, but then again, here is a company that makes up the backbone of the web, and increasingly mobile, based near entirely on advertising revenue. 

    What I do think this article lacks… considering it’s title… are the actual reasons why you should be concerned about being tracked. It focuses more on deconstructing its targeted article which claims you shouldn’t be worried, than explaining why you should. After all, what is actually the problem with Google knowing your browsing habits?

    I think people should realise what information is being tracked, and then stop, think and decide whether they’re willing to give that information up, because the truth of invasion of privacy is that for the vast majority it will never have any tangible negative effect on their lives (much like like the person peering at you naked in your garden doesn’t influence you until you find out about it.)

  • Dominic

    Going in to the actual reasons would have deviated from the purpose of the article. If you’re interested, we can have that discussion though.

  • Pingback: Facebook, Google and the death of online privacy [Infographic] | memeburn

  • Pingback: 15 of the coolest hidden Google tricks | memeburn

  • Pingback: 17 of the coolest hidden Google tricks – Hacking Arena

  • Pingback: 17 Google Tricks! « Welcome to BABYHACKER Blog

  • Pingback: 17 of the coolest hidden Google tricks | Infotech Arena

  • Pingback: 17 of the coolest hidden Google tricks « xperto

  • Rob

    I suspect the author was too busy disagreeing to actually research this argument fully, which is wonderfully ironic as he critiques the Simon on failing to do that.

Related articles

Topics for this article

[ advertising enquiries ]

Share
  • BURN MEDIA TV

    WATCH THE LATEST EPISODE NOW
    Latest Episode
    Data woes? Here's 6 data saving tips for your smartphone

MORE HEADLINES

news

VIEW MORE

interviews

VIEW MORE

future trends

VIEW MORE

entrepreneurship

VIEW MORE

social media

VIEW MORE

facebook

VIEW MORE

twitter

VIEW MORE

google

VIEW MORE

advertising & marketing

VIEW MORE

online media

VIEW MORE

design

VIEW MORE

mobile

VIEW MORE

More in General Tech

Can ultrabooks halt the 'post PC world' onslaught?

Read More »