• Motorburn
      Because cars are gadgets
    • Gearburn
      Incisive reviews for the gadget obsessed
    • Ventureburn
      Startup news for emerging markets
    • Jobsburn
      Digital industry jobs for the anti 9 to 5!
Steve Jobs at WWDC 2010 taken by Wired's Jon Snyder

Given a little more energy Steve Jobs would’ve built an Apple car

This is interesting. Tucked away in Nick Bilton’s New York Times article about Apple potentially building an iWatch is a revelation that Steve Jobs actually wanted to build an Apple car.

According to Bilton:

In a meeting in his office before he died, Steven P. Jobs, Apple’s co-founder and former chief executive, told John Markoff of The New York Times that if he had more energy, he would have liked to take on Detroit with an Apple car.

The language used in that quote suggests that Jobs might have only come up with the idea near his death, when Google’s self-driving cars had already racked up hundreds of thousands of kilometers in testing. That many not however be the case.

As Bilton notes, when Apple’s Phil Schiller took to the stand during the company’s epic patent trial against Samsung, he revealed that the Cupertino-based tech giant had looked at making “crazy stuff”, including a camera or a car, before the development of the iPhone and the iPad.

It’s unclear whether or not Apple’s car would’ve been autonomous. The fact that Jobs wanted to take on the Detroit manufacturers, it might not have been. Given the way things are going right now however, it’s difficult to believe that it wouldn’t at least have seen the opportunities present in autonomous vehicles.

If Apple had forged ahead and built a self-driving car, the space could have been much more interesting by now. The people other than Google trying to get autonomous cars on the road right now are pretty much all vehicle manufacturers. While the engineers working on these projects are undoubtedly brilliant, one can’t help but wonder where we’d be right now if one of the fiercest rivalries in tech went on the road.

Author | Stuart Thomas: Senior Reporter

Stuart Thomas: Senior Reporter
Stuart Thomas joined the Burn Media team in 2011 while finishing off an MA in South African Literature. Eager to prove his geek credentials, he allowed himself to be thrown in the deep and did his best stay afloat. When not fused with his keyboard, you can find him... More
  • Andy Walker

    I completely agree John. Backward compat is definitely a nice little idea, but it’s clear that Sony’s not really interested. I imagine if it takes off on Xbox One, they’ll have to counter.

    It’s great to see the two company’s differing opinions though. For a minute, console gaming (except for Nintendo) was getting a bit stale. All these varying strategies sets up the console war very nicely going into 2016.

    Agreed! It’s going to be epic. Let’s just hope Square gives it to us in a timely manner!

  • Paul

    I’m not sure that I buy the entire “performance hit” due solely to a software upgrade, but even if there is one, the impact it has would be pretty questionable. More importantly, Microsoft is really rolling the dice in that the Xbox 360 would become largely obsolete but it would make the Xbone more attractive for first time next-gen buyers. I suspect Sony would follow suit if Microsoft gobbled up too much market share, but for now they’ll wait and see. No reason to make the PS3 obsolete too.