The danger of augmenting reality

email article email article print article print article tip @techmeme

Tony Stark

Augmented reality (AR) is not new, it’s a concept that has been around for ages and has seen a massive rise in popularity along with the ascendancy of the smartphone. AR allows you to apply an additional layer of information onto the real world to provide useful information that would otherwise not be available. With applications from heads up displays (HUD) through to interactive advertising, augmented reality sounds like a great avenue of future technology, available today.

The key differentiator between augmented reality now and in the future is the device integration. At the moment you need to use your smartphone to manually access an augmented reality, very soon you will be able to use devices such as Google Glass that allow for more permanent engagement with various levels of augmentation and in the future we could see permanent biological integration of such a system (directly within our retinas enhancing the visual information sent to our brains). This is a very science fiction sounding concept but essentially very plausible in the near future.

So what do you say? We have seen these concepts in sci-fi novels and futuristic movies and not only does it look really cool but it is intrinsically useful to daily life. However, what many of these movies don’t show you is the potential monetisation of these systems, the inherent need of the human race to profit from everything. This is where we face the potential dangers of a fully augmented reality.

Imagine a world where we have a digital device embedded within us that displayed a HUD augmented reality layer to everything that we see. This interface could be customized with widgets such as current temperature or time of day and even record and upload what we see directly to our future social networks. Looking at a book lying on a table would trigger a small window to pop up giving you a summary of the book and the author.

Now imagine the potential of a system like that within the advertising world. You would experience at the very least, contextual advertising based on the images you are seeing. For example when looking at that book you would see recommendations for other books and info about the various places that you can buy that book or even purchase a coffee at the same time. You may even be served an audio advertisement for a new video game that shares a similar genre as the book you are looking at.

Physical outdoor advertising would change dramatically with billboards/posters just being blank canvases and the software within your embedded device layering an advert targeted directly to you onto that canvas. Your world would be custom designed with advertising targeting you. This means that each individual person would see a different reality based on their age, income, interests and purchase history. Essentially what would happen is that the advanced targeting that we are starting to become accustomed to within the online space, will start to become a tangible part of real life.

Technology companies continue to explore deeper integration and develop new devices in order to move closer to this goal of a fully augmented reality. While AR is an amazing piece of technology and without a doubt a key concept for the future, it is important to be aware of the potential danger of allowing companies to intertwine their services into our lives.

email article email article print article print article
  • http://twitter.com/Green_Guerrilla David Anthony Alves

    Nice piece, Matt. Would have liked to have seen a little more embellishment about what you think the dangers of AR could be. The mind boggles at the amount of danger this kind of technology could pose, but in essence, how much have each of us already given us to the dark crevasse that is the internet? Would human nature simply become accustomed to the integration technology like this will require to be fully useful in every day life? Is there an opt out? And would opting out on AR and Google Glass integration be eventually opting out on life all together?

  • Pingback: Augmented Reality and profiling | IDentifEYE

  • http://twitter.com/matthewarnold Matthew Arnold

    Thanks David. I wanted to keep it fairly open ended to get people thinking. I believe that this sort of thing will happen whether we like it or not. Premium services or content always comes at a cost either with a monthly fee or with advertising support. I guess we would become accustomed to advertising like this as it slowly phases in (as it has done with online advertising) but at some point it is likely to become overly intrusive. We could see a situation that polarises consumers; those opting for the enhanced experiences of embedded AR devices and happy to endure the ads and those that start to rebel against technology entirely and refuse to have any part of it (at the expense of the benefits it brings).

Related Articles on the Web

Most popular articles


Topics for this article

[ advertising enquiries ]
[ advertising enquiries ]

MORE HEADLINES

news

VIEW MORE

interviews

VIEW MORE

future trends

VIEW MORE

entrepreneurship

VIEW MORE

social media

VIEW MORE

facebook

VIEW MORE

twitter

VIEW MORE

google

VIEW MORE

advertising & marketing

VIEW MORE

online media

VIEW MORE

design

VIEW MORE

mobile

VIEW MORE

More in Augmented Reality, Future Trends

A return to honesty: grappling with the future of online porn [SXSW]

Read More »