We vote in public… South Africa’s first real-time, tweeted election

email article email article print article print article tip @techmeme

Vote

It’s different this time. In South Africa’s last general election in 2009, 99% of people had never even heard of Twitter (only a handful of people in the county had accounts back then, and they hardly used them). This time round, millions are on Twitter. Over 5.5-million, in fact (according to the most recent study by World Wide Worx). By this stage, that number’s probably closer to 6-million… All tweeting, retweeting and consuming in real-time.

Of course the US Presidential Election in 2012 gave the world a taste of all of this. Then, though, the combination of Twitter and TV was still in its infancy. South Africa’s last election — the municipal election in 2011 — was still too early. Plus, politicking and campaigning was very localised.

In planning for Wednesday’s election, South African television news networks (and news websites) must’ve been salivating at the thought. Especially now that there are three (!) 24-hour news channels to fill. The complex process of audience interaction on broadcast television has been largely solved by Twitter. The paradigm has shifted completely – from tweeting about what’s on the news, to Twitter becoming news. What better (and cheaper) way to fill hours and hours of dead broadcast time than with presenters reading random tweets?

Websites have cottoned on, with single tweets becoming news stories in their own right. South Africa’s largest news site, News24, has become a pro at this. This site too.

Twitter has afforded us the luxury of real-time coverage of political rallies, of debates, of campaigning… We can pick and choose. Not only from the politicians and their handlers, but top political writers too. The kind we could read every 24 hours, subbed-down to fill a hole between adverts, printed for eternity on newsprint. You know them… Stephen Grootes, Justice Malala, Ranjeni Munusamy. Now, with instant analysis. Distilled into 140 characters. Follow, unfollow, retweet, reply, engage.

Politicians have (sensibly) seized on the opportunity to engage with voters in a disintermediated way. The power of this, from a voter’s perspective, is really quite incredible. In Twitter ‘Town Halls’ (or ‘Q&As’, depending on the party), citizens from far flung corners of the country have been able to engage with political leaders and quiz them on anything and everything. That was simply inconceivable three or four years ago. The three largest parties, the ruling African National Congress (ANC), the opposition Democratic Alliance (DA) and upstart Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) have drowned out nearly every other conversation on Twitter in recent weeks. The latter two have, perhaps, punched above their weight.

(How valuable are the party election broadcasts – free ads made available to parties – on national broadcaster the SABC in 2014?)

The two front-runners, in terms of followers at least, remain Julius Malema (head of the EFF) and Helen Zille (head of the DA). Malema retains a lead with roughly 450 000 followers vs Zille’s 410 000. The ANC was relatively late to the Twitter game, with its official account at 120 000 followers and Malusi Gigaba (current minister of public enterprises and third on the ANC’s parliamentary list) at 72 000.

Political Twitter following

Twitter has also afforded the parties a means to communicate to local communities. So accounts for well-organised, suburban branches across all parties have popped up. Most with a few hundred followers, but in aggregate, these are even more powerful.

Of course, the negative of this disintermediation, is that some followers will be swayed by half-truths (and blatant lies) from politicians.

But hey, this is politics.

The virality of Twitter has been fascinating to watch, too. News no longer waits for hourly broadcasts on radio or TV. The ballot box incident overnight (where voting materials were found at a party agent’s house in the East Rand) was a twitter storm on Tuesday morning.

Mistakes or missteps by parties are pointed out and amplified. The (now) well-known pic of yellow luxury cars campaigning for the ANC became a meme. A number of the tweets sharing the photo have been deleted — there’ve been plenty of cheap shots taken, with the tweets hastily removed after they’ve have their effect.

In perhaps the clearest sign of our times, the Independent Electoral Commission was forced into asking voters not to take ‘selfies’ in the ballot booth on Wednesday.

We live in public indeed.

Image: Darryn van der Valt via Flickr.

email article email article print article print article

  • Pingback: We vote in public… South Africa’s first real-time, tweeted election | memeburn | Verified Voting

  • Nat Turner

    All that is said about social media sites in Azania – South Africa.
    an important point is missing,
    which is the support two of our most popular sites are giving to race terrorist elements who are hoping to bring down Black African rule in the country.
    Both the Boeremag & the Mangaung plotters have resorted to terror tactics in pursuit of their aims,
    Neo Genocide have recently said “Malema’s diatribe” will lead to the “biggest blood river in African history” in response to some of the proposals from Julius Malema of the E.F.F., regarding land reform.
    The aim of these groups is an all Whites state grabbed from this African land.
    Facebook is hosting support pages for the jailed Boeremag terrors, they have banned me from the site for highlighting their hypocrisy,
    Twitter likewise has banned me for campaigning against the brother group of the above organizations which calls itself “No White genocide in SA”,
    their claim is that the ANC government has organised a 20 year campaign of genocide against the White community sighting figures of 85,000 to 165,000 murdered White folk.
    They claimed that 2014 the murder rate had increased, I exposed the fact that of a possible 4,500 murders to the end of March the total of murdered White people is 70, during this expose Twitter bans me.
    So as much as social network sites have many positive aspects to them, our two most popular ones do themselves or us any favors by supporting terrorists and those who would bring down one of the leading economies of the continent.
    My fear is after the resounding victory later today in the election, recalcitrant elements may become more desperate.
    After all, neither Facebook or Twitter would support Al Qaeda, would they.
    http://www.thepetitionsite.com/580/770/040/facebook-stop-hosting-terrorists/
    http://natturner1.wordpress.com/

  • Pingback: Here’s who dominated online conversation during the South African election [Infographic] | memeburn

Related articles

Topics for this article

[ advertising enquiries ]

Share
  • BURN MEDIA TV

    WATCH THE LATEST EPISODE NOW
    Latest Episode
    Unboxing the Lenovo Yoga 10

MORE HEADLINES

news

VIEW MORE

interviews

VIEW MORE

future trends

VIEW MORE

entrepreneurship

VIEW MORE

social media

VIEW MORE

facebook

VIEW MORE

twitter

VIEW MORE

google

VIEW MORE

advertising & marketing

VIEW MORE

online media

VIEW MORE

design

VIEW MORE

mobile

VIEW MORE

More in Social media

Why your business thrives at the point where social and SEO meet: a reminder

Read More »
Link Link Link