Initial denial of Apple’s ‘iPad Mini’ trademark application retracted

email article email article print article print article tip @techmeme

ipad mini 01

No it wasn’t a joke. The objections to Apple’s ‘iPad Mini’ Trademark Application issued on 1 April by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) were all too real. These objections though, one week later, have officially been withdrawn.

According to MacRumours the primary objection, related to the ‘iPad mini’ name being determined as “descriptive” rather than a distinctive product name was removed as well as the secondary objection, relating to the use of the iPad mini overview page as a “specimen” that indicated that the product was being offered for sale.

This Office action supersedes any previous Office action issued in connection with this application.

Upon further review of the application, the examining attorney has determined that the following refusals issued in the initial Office action should be withdrawn. The examining attorney apologizes for any inconvenience caused.

REFUSALS WITHDRAWN:

The Trademark Act Section 2(e)(1) descriptiveness refusal and the Sections 1 and 45 specimen refusal are both withdrawn.

The USPTO office action – dated 3 April – therefore formally retracts the initial denial of Apple’s application for the trademark ‘iPad Mini’, yet it keeps other stipulations in place, specifically with regards to how Apple may use the term ‘mini’.

The document requests that Apple add a disclaimer to its trademark application to specify that Apple only want to safeguard the use of the term ‘mini’ when used in conjunction with the ‘iPad mini’ name.

Applicant must disclaim the descriptive wording “MINI” apart from the mark shown because it merely describes a quality, characteristic or feature of applicant’s goods.

This disclaimer would free up any of Apple’s competitors to use the term ‘mini’ when naming their own products.

Interestingly, the issue was resolved without any response from Apple to USPTO. MacRumours alludes that the decision could have been informed by the publicity the decision garnered. Perhaps USPTO felt they had to clarify on what some thought was just an April’s fools joke.

email article email article print article print article

Most popular articles

Topics for this article

[ advertising enquiries ]

Share
  • BURN MEDIA TV

    WATCH THE LATEST EPISODE NOW
    Latest Episode
    Review of Gmail Inbox app

MORE HEADLINES

news

VIEW MORE

interviews

VIEW MORE

future trends

VIEW MORE

entrepreneurship

VIEW MORE

social media

VIEW MORE

facebook

VIEW MORE

twitter

VIEW MORE

google

VIEW MORE

advertising & marketing

VIEW MORE

online media

VIEW MORE

design

VIEW MORE

mobile

VIEW MORE

More in Apple, iPad

iSteve teaser trailer: buzzwords and awesome clichés

Read More »