• Motorburn
      Because cars are gadgets
    • Gearburn
      Incisive reviews for the gadget obsessed
    • Ventureburn
      Startup news for emerging markets
    • Jobsburn
      Digital industry jobs for the anti 9 to 5!

How Google’s recent algorithm changes are encouraging negative SEO

This is shocking and it’s a direct result of Google’s algorithm changes. Here’s a case study, courtesy of SEOBook, of a website being prepared for launch and how a competitor managed to get it flagged as a scam site — before it was even launched:

Enter www.buymycar.com, an idea I had wanted to do for some time, where people list a car and it gets sent to a network of dealers who bid on it from a secure area. A simple idea but FAR from simple to implement.

Satisfied I had ticked all the boxes from hours of Matt Cutts video’s and Google guidelines documents, I went to work… I was enjoying building what I had hoped would be a useful site and kicked myself for not having done so sooner. I also thanked Google mentally for being smart enough now to reward better sites.

But after four months of work, testing, and signing up car dealers, and still before the full launch, the website owner Robert Prime, checked to see what links there were to the site. To his horror he found 13 208 sites had used a link to his site using the anchor text “Buy My Car Scam.”

…this was absolutely devastating to see.

A worried competitor had obviously decided I was a threat and to nip my site in the bud with Google and attack it before it had even fully started. The live launch date was scheduled for January 7th, 2013!

… I was faced with death by Google rankings … before it had any rankings… my site being cited as a scam across the internet before it launched!

Negative search engine optimisation was rare until Google changed its algorithm over the past two years and started paying attention to the quality of the sites linking to any website.

It has led to a huge erasure of hyperlinks as websites try to clean up large networks of their back-links.

But it has also added masses of new hyperlinks designed to tarnish the online reputation of a competitor and to flag it within Google as a potential scam or spam site.

When competitors gain by using this tactic what is the response of an ethical business? Does it have to do the same because that’s what the mechanics of Google’s algorithm dictates?

How can businesses behave ethically if Google only responds to unethical behavior by others, such as labeling a competitor a scam?

The Google algorithm is more than a collection of numerical values — it also has ethical and moral values built in that can’t be easily seen. The rise in negative SEO shows how the design of the algorithm can encourage unethical business practices.

Can Google design an algorithm that rewards ethical businesses? Companies competing to be more ethical than each other would be a very good thing to see.

If Google can do one then it can do the other.

This article by Tom Foremski originally appeared on Silicon Valley Watcher and is republished with permission.

Author | Tom Foremski: In Silicon Valley

Tom Foremski: In Silicon Valley
Tom Foremski is a former Financial Times journalist and the Founder and Publisher of Silicon Valley Watcher, which is an online news site reporting on the business of Silicon Valley and the culture of disruption. More
  • Laura Medley

    Yes, but hasn’t Google also said that with the new algorithm changes backlinks should consist of different terms and keywords or else they are not taken as seriously. They did this to keep website owners from artificially inflating their links as was prone to do prior to the latest changes (although I’m sure many still try that tack. I see “SEO” companies all the time saying they will guarantee 900 backlinks for a low rate of $19.95 and the like), to prevent Google Bombs (ala the Goerge Bush incident among other) and basically to try and make sure things grow organically online (ir at least seem so) as much as possible. So 250 backlinks that had to have been made at a close proximity in time to each other, with the exact same terms to a site that doesnt even exist yet should throw up a red flag for sure to the algorithm responsible for dealing with this type of nefarious behavior. At least from everything Ive read.

  • OneVoiceSays

    Google is not likely to address your issue with false information. They do not respond to reports of issues with comments and ratings on Google places pages. I have been trying for over a year to get a comment removed from my church’s page that says that we “kill and eat babies”. Google ignores all communication.

  • Google is making too many changes too often.

More in Google, SEO

Google brings free WiFi to New Yorkers

Read More »