• Motorburn
      Because cars are gadgets
    • Gearburn
      Incisive reviews for the gadget obsessed
    • Ventureburn
      Startup news for emerging markets
    • Jobsburn
      Digital industry jobs for the anti 9 to 5!

LinkedIn’s dropped its age restriction to 13: here’s why it matters

In one of my previous articles I spoke about how LinkedIn is opening the platform up to younger markets and specifically targeting students. This is a strong strategic move on LinkedIn’s part — but it begs the question as to whether this kind of development is taking away from our youth’s childhoods.

Since 12 September, users as young as 13 have been able to sign up for the world’s largest “professional” network after it lowered its minimum age requirement.

The thinking behind this is to encourage young people to plan out their career paths by comparing themselves to others on the site and getting an early start.

My feelings towards this announcement are twofold; I am in favour of young people starting to think about the future sooner rather than later and starting to get themselves known within the market. However my concern is about whether a 13-year-old is equipped to manage a professional profile on a platform like LinkedIn.

The decreasing of the age restriction coincides with the launch of University Pages, where potential students can learn about universities worldwide and connect with students or alumni to hear about their experiences and future career paths. This I do agree with and feel is very important.

LinkedIn has confirmed that the security settings will be different for users under 18, with their year of birth, surname and specific location hidden and profile picture only visible to their connections. They also won’t appear in search engine results pages.

But how young is too young?

Sure we’d all love to be business savvy and child prodigy like Richie Rich but is this kind of development putting a lot of unnecessary pressure on young people who are having to deal with enough as it is – going through puberty, discovering who they are, etc. Is this not just going make to all of the regular childhood and teenage problems that much greater?

This also opens up the discussion as to whether by allowing children as young as 13 to engage on professional networks, where there are numerous recruiters out there looking to fill intern type positions, are at increased risk of being exploited or taken advantage of. The average 13-year-old doesn’t understand how to negotiate a contract or what is and isn’t expected of them.

Where I feel the gap is, and where LinkedIn can fill it, is when children reach the age of 16 to 18 and start thinking about what subject choices to make, what type of careers they would be interested in, and what universities would be right for them. But at 13 all they’re really concerned about is the latest Bieber hit, pouting and twerking – let’s be honest.

Keep it in the playground

The fact is that being professional and engaging with fellow professionals requires a certain degree of maturity. Which, like it or not, the average 13-year-old doesn’t have.

To date, LinkedIn has had a very strong identity as a professional network. With these latest changes, it could potentially lose its uniqueness and the appeal to their demographic. So if this new age restriction does come into play what does that mean for the professional networker on LinkedIn? Are they going to be flooded with invitations to connect from 13 year olds who add little if any value to their network?

Is there a place for LinkedIn Jnr?

In my opinion if LinkedIn did want to start engaging with this younger audience I feel it would be more appropriate to start a new network, something like LinkedIn Jnr, where children and students under 18 can connect with each other and educators to talk about relevant topics (be it school or sports related) and create an environment where they can really extract value from these conversations. They can then migrate to the professional network once the reach 18.

Advertising from universities or companies offering intern positions could then be targeted better and the messaging could be reworked to appeal to a younger audience. Because quite frankly, at 13 you’re not worried about your RA and whether you future career is going to come with good benefits.

The point is a 13-year-old has a very different mindset to a college graduate, 20-something professional or CEO. They can’t all be lumped into the same network and still expect the platform to extract and deliver value.

Author | Megan Bernstein

Megan Bernstein
Megan has a love and passion for great brands and extraordinary advertising. She is a true Generation Y baby. Immersed in all forms of new age marketing finding it an invaluable tool. Social media strategist for DigitLab by day, blogger for under5foot and Memeburn by night. More
  • thabomophiring

    Depends completely on the 13rd year old, some are quite advanced in their thinking, some are not.

    I predict LinkedIn will include a do not let anyone under the age of ?? contact me option. You ca also just decline the connect. No harm done.

    I support this move as it will help those students who wish to engage in a professional manner to learn how, early on. It will enable them to learn without the noise of Twitter and Facebook.

  • jerseygirl1

    I disagree with the assumption that 13 years are only interested in Bieber and twerking. I know of many, many 13-year-olds that couldn’t care less about those things, and are anxious to get started in making money, becoming entrepreneurial, or even launching their own non-profit. All of these young people would benefit greatly from a profile on Linked In.

    I agree that an influx of teenagers into Linked In has the capacity to dilute the relevancy and the site’s strong identity. One of the nice things about Linked In, which sets it apart from other social networks, is the strong emphasis on professional life. Not sure what a this move is going to add to the overall user experience. Potentially nothing, and possibly might detract from it. It obviously has great marketing potential. Expanding its marketing reach is a smart move for Linked In, especially with the university tie-in. I think the idea to instead have a LinkedIn Jr. makes more sense, at least in the beginning.

  • Stephen Emhecht

    I really don’t see the big deal. The brainless kiddos obssessed with the latest trends and J-Biebz will ignore it as “some nerd shit” and the go-getters who actually want to make something of themselves will make an account and act like a young adult.

More in LinkedIn, Social

How to get started with measuring your social media campaign

Read More »