AI is disrupting education. But despite what the headlines (and some ChatGPT horror stories) might suggest, South African teachers aren’t being replaced — they’re…
Surviving an online brand attack
I’m becoming a regular reader of the Quirk blog (and not just because of their recent SEO article). Here is a piece on ten…
A cellphone & the power of the blogosphere
I’m a gadget freak. Need the latest with most buttons. Gotta have Gotta have… you know how it is. It’s an expensive little vice…
Online ads: What’s working?
Online advertising as we know it is crude. But it is entering a new era of sophistication….
The internet allows us to target advertising to an unprecedented degree, so why are most banner ads still served on such a hit-and-miss basis?
Publishers slap up an insurance ad on a homepage in the hope they will get the industry average 0,3% click-through rate or more. If they achieve that click-through rate, everyone is happy. But here is the question — what happened to the other 99,7%? Surely by any standards this is a pretty inefficient ratio? It may be at first glance, but that 0,3% is still valuable enough for advertisers to achieve major return on investment by forking out big bucks to be on the major sites.
The type of client found on local online publishers give us a clue as to what is working on the web. For example, insurance and car companies have had a very successful love affair with the internet. The one thing they have in common is that a single acquisition equals very high value for them, for example someone buying a car or taking out a long-term insurance policy. It’s also why the high-worth online audience, which can afford to pay regular premiums, works for their brand… (read on)
24.com & Yahoo!
I wandered over to Yahoo! for the first time in a long time and was struck by the similarity of the site with our…